Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,611.83
(
0.44%
)
US TECH 100
23,531.58
(
0.57%
)
Dow Jones
46,669.88
(
0.36%
)
Brent Oil
106.76
(
-2.22%
)
Bitcoin
69,839.59
(
1.20%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 435762
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

mickeybritt

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 93
Posts 15732
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/04/2003

mickeybritt

Re: mschere post# 14152

Thursday, 03/20/2003 10:48:12 AM

Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:48:12 AM

Post# of 435762
mschere

I think QCOM needs the IDCC TDD for one thing, and another thing is the QCOM patents are getting old and I am not sure if they even with continuation patents would be able to be collected on. I also think IDCC has the biggest percentage of 3G patents. I also think like some companies buy their competition out to protect their territory, tha QCOM doesn't need any competition, especially if CDMA2000 can be achieved with IDCC patents or a close enough version. I am no technical person, but trust me QCOM would love to own the IDCC patent portfolio and have that cash coming in, and maybe they keep IDCC as a wholly owned subsidary.

Mickey
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News