InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 840
Posts 120456
Boards Moderated 18
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: ilpapa post# 6464

Monday, 03/04/2013 4:51:09 PM

Monday, March 04, 2013 4:51:09 PM

Post# of 29591
HES (+3.5%) counters Elliott’s proposal with one of its own, and shareholders evidently like it…

PR:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/hess-announces-culmination-transformation-pure-120000264.html

Webcast slides:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/4447/000119312513088685/d495802ddefa14a.htm

The main difference between the two proposals is the constitution of the BoD (i.e. HES’ new nominees vs Elliott’s nominees) and the degree of business fragmentation when all is said and done.

HES’ own proposal contemplates divesting the downstream operations (including the convenience stores), the Bakken midstream assets, and all assets in Indonesia and Thailand. Elliott’s proposal would have split HES into many more pieces, including distinct companies for the Bakken, Gulf of Mexico, and foreign assets.

All told, I think HES has addressed the concerns raised by Elliott and done them one better. Comments welcome.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.