News Focus
News Focus
Followers 843
Posts 122985
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: ilpapa post# 6464

Monday, 03/04/2013 4:51:09 PM

Monday, March 04, 2013 4:51:09 PM

Post# of 30545
HES (+3.5%) counters Elliott’s proposal with one of its own, and shareholders evidently like it…

PR:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/hess-announces-culmination-transformation-pure-120000264.html

Webcast slides:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/4447/000119312513088685/d495802ddefa14a.htm

The main difference between the two proposals is the constitution of the BoD (i.e. HES’ new nominees vs Elliott’s nominees) and the degree of business fragmentation when all is said and done.

HES’ own proposal contemplates divesting the downstream operations (including the convenience stores), the Bakken midstream assets, and all assets in Indonesia and Thailand. Elliott’s proposal would have split HES into many more pieces, including distinct companies for the Bakken, Gulf of Mexico, and foreign assets.

All told, I think HES has addressed the concerns raised by Elliott and done them one better. Comments welcome.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today