"One thing scientists agree on, though, is that the requirement of testability excludes supernatural explanations. The supernatural, by definition, does not have to follow any rules or regularities, so it cannot be tested."
===============================================================
hap...
So Creation, God, and the supernatural are automatically defined by "science" as impossible, excluded from all consideration, and barred from the curriculum -- our children are taught that there is no God. God and the Bible are allowed to be mentioned only as a "philosophy" and even that is frowned upon. In other words, atheism, or at best agnosticism, are the only approved worldview, and secular humanism has become the official religion of the state.
That is fine as long as God does not exist, but if there is a God, it is a disaster for the children taught under such a regime. They are taught day after day that the official position of the state and nation is that there is no God, no Creator, and we evolved by mere chance over time from nothing to everything.
The scientists argue that the supernatural is not testable and therefore cannot be proven false, therefore it cannot be so. If one cannot see the fallacy in that argument, he needs a refresher course in logic. I have personally seen the supernatural intervention of God in my own life and in the lives of others many times over the years -- God has proven His existence to me without shadow of doubt, yet these scientists want to tell me that He cannot be scientifically validated therefore He does not exist from a scientific viewpoint. What a farce.
Evolution also cannot be disproven, neither can it be tested or recreated (pardon the pun) in the laboratory. Yet it is taught to our children as fact. The sheer size and complexity of the universe and the world around us argues for the existence of God, but our children are told that it all resulted by chance, over time. Evolution has no answer to the most basic question of "where did life come from", yet it rejects the only obvious answer to that question. Even the most basic, primitive single celled organism is so complex and amazing that the odds of it developing by mere chance in some primordial "glop" are so astronomical as to place it in the realm of pure fantasy on a par with a tornado going through a junkyard and producing a perfect 747, yet our children are taught exactly that.
When very young, our children are told about a frog turning into a prince, and it is called a myth. When they get older they are told that a frog turned into a man, and it is called evolution. God has news for the scientists -- they are both myths.
mlsoft
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
