InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 1069
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/08/2010

Re: iluvsitong post# 49474

Thursday, 01/31/2013 4:57:33 PM

Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:57:33 PM

Post# of 94142
I have spoken to Andrew on the phone and over email several times in the past, not recently. But he always insists on talking on the phone rather than putting things in writing in an email and he always insists that I do not share our conversations with other investors. That seems fishy to me. I think everyone should be given the same information and anything that is said to one investors should be available to any investor and they should be ok with us copy and pasting any conversation anywhere. But the biggest problem really is that he never really gave me any useful information at all. And this is fine, really it is the way it should be since any meaningful information should be shared publicly. Because of the reasons above calling the company is only good if you want to listen to a soothing voice telling you all will be ok rather than actually getting more information.

And I am not saying we need to be informed of every single little detail through a PR but the fact is this company needs to go above and beyond to prove themselves honest and real at this point. Let's be honest, the facts do not make them look good right now so a PR frequency that may be fine for a blue chip is horribly inadequate for a small start-up with absolutely 0 proven results, with years of delays, with very flimsy excuses, with PRs later proven false, with AMF investigations and so on. And the excuse that some people will not like the PR or will attack it is so childish that it doesn't even need to be mentioned.