News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2583
Posts 329424
Boards Moderated 23
Alias Born 04/12/2001

Re: Sooah post# 121060

Sunday, 01/13/2013 4:00:08 PM

Sunday, January 13, 2013 4:00:08 PM

Post# of 167993
No one other than SRGE and Kinross knows whether additional agreements beyond the C.A. were signed. Kinross can deny what they want.

The SEC knows. You can count on that.

Thought you said SEC requested documents from Kinross?

I said the SEC probably requested documents from Kinross. But that would have been after the PR appeared and Kinross denied its content.

If the an employee signed any agreement that certifies they have the authority to bind a corporation, the Corporation is bound.

Yes. To that document. But Moscosa would not have had the authority to bind the company to ANY agreement.

Has it occurred to you that perhaps the SEC is still reviewing documents? How do you go about carrying on that the SEC already reviewed everything?

Oh, I'm sure they'll continue to request document production over time. But I should think their immediate concern was that outrageous PR. They'd have wanted to see everything relevant to that right away, I should think.

Why? Because they don't suspend without cause. They'd have wanted to make the right call before they served a death sentence on the company.

Obviously you want to believe SRGE is a legitimate company. The SEC disagrees with you.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y