News Focus
News Focus
Followers 461
Posts 7524
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2010

Re: janice shell post# 121037

Sunday, 01/13/2013 3:22:20 PM

Sunday, January 13, 2013 3:22:20 PM

Post# of 167993
You are wrong here Janice. Given we have not seen the entire C.A., we cannot state that SRGE did not have the right to identity Kinross as a partner. I believe the Company knows well what their rights are.

You know when you've signed a JV agreement.

Obviously not because Kinross PR'd <to the best of their knowledge.> You either signed or did not sign, not <as far as I know, I did not sign>.

At some time prior to that morning, the SEC requested documents regarding the supposed JV. They were not impressed, and had no problem suspending trading. That should tell you all you need to know.

How do you know? Did the SEC impart this information to you? If the SEC contacted Kinross and requested documents as you claim, and Kinross HQ could not reach Moscosa on the same day to obtain a copy, how could the SEC have received documents from Kinross?

Further, if Kinross said they did not have any documents that answer could be construed as there being no documents.

Note that Kinross are not afraid of the SEC. Read their filings and see how many times the SEC has contacted them and warned them over disclosure issues.

The rest are irrelevant as I will believe the Company that they had/have evidence to believe that Kinross became a Partner at 12/26.

Again, note that SRGE never claimed to have signed a JV Agreement with Kinross in their PR 12/26. Those comments came from the forum.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y