Stervc so let me get this straight, you will not put up a series of factual and public rebuttals from Kinross denying the deals existence until you have heard from SRGE who has proven to have lied time after time? Is this what is considered significant DD or selective acceptance of facts.
SRGE is caught in a fraud and you are waiting for the fraudsters to reply with some BS story before you are willing to remove your sticky or update it with the real facts? the sticky was INSTANTLY updated when SRGE reported the deal with Kinross but not when Kinross denies the deal - TWICE!!!!