News Focus
News Focus

es1

Followers 153
Posts 16535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2009

es1

Re: brettbull post# 127374

Monday, 12/17/2012 10:07:04 PM

Monday, December 17, 2012 10:07:04 PM

Post# of 165875
I agree with what you say except the PR.
His investors know what they hold (or should). They did not need reassurance.

And Yes I am saying the Chinese are going to choose very low grade to deal with.


They already have 51%.


Not in this world they dont.
They are trying to get 51%.

So Scott says....

Two of the assays returned Nb2O5 (niobium pentoxide) results of 0.86% and 0.51% respectively. A third sample returned negligible Nb2O5 results, with 6700 ppm Ta2O5.

So if these were the 3 samples the Chinese took they would toss out the .86% and Throw in a lower number and say

"Well Scott Our samples came back with 0.51% and 0.17% respectively. A third sample returned negligible Nb2O5 results.
We are still interested but I would not be able to give you $20M for 51% I would give you $20M for 80%"

It would be feasible to get those results knowing Scott had a sample with nothing in it.

If the Chinese results happen to come back at 1.02%, 0.83%,0.68% We would have a signed deal now. Or Scott could potentially make a better deal.
This is a business negotiation it is very fluid and anything is possible.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y