Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,133.88
(
0.35%
)
US TECH 100
25,970.00
(
0.38%
)
Dow Jones
49,806.70
(
0.73%
)
Brent Oil
91.91
(
1.36%
)
Bitcoin
75,891.93
(
0.00%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 435829
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Learning2vest

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 32
Posts 2781
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/23/2003

Learning2vest

Member Level

Re: JeffreyHF post# 130528

Wednesday, 10/26/2005 12:14:23 PM

Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:14:23 PM

Post# of 435829
The Lucent litigation may be limited to Tantivy IPR, but I'm guessing that IDCC would not agree to a settlement unless it included a "convenience" license covering ALL of their IPR in the CDMA2000 standard, i.e., the IPR in BOTH the Tantivy AND the IDCC portfolios.

Actually, this observer is hoping that IDCC is determined to hold firm on getting a "convenience" license on ALL of the 3G standards before they agree to any settlement terms with Lucent.



Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News