InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,621.47
(
0.91%
)
US TECH 100
19,160.80
(
0.88%
)
Dow Jones
41,077.68
(
0.90%
)
Brent Oil
78.38
(
2.33%
)
Bitcoin
63,395.55
(
5.01%
)
Post# of 47233
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Rien

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 929
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2002

Rien

Re: jibes post# 7646

Friday, 03/07/2003 2:19:35 AM

Friday, March 07, 2003 2:19:35 AM

Post# of 47233
Hi Jibes,
I do think that you would need to run a test over a full cycle. In the Cisco case you stop when the share price has not yet recovered to its old high. But it is the premise of AIM that a stock WILL recover (otherwise your stock selection was wrong!).
After all, AIM did end up with more shares, thus the potential to beat New-AIM is there.

BTW: It looks more like XDEV than AIM to me, maybe you should call it New-XDEV? (VBG)
(XDEV uses the deviation from a SMA, you use the deviation from the last buy/sell)

Best,
Rien.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up