InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 835
Posts 120305
Boards Moderated 18
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: OakesCS post# 6060

Saturday, 11/10/2012 12:03:28 PM

Saturday, November 10, 2012 12:03:28 PM

Post# of 29541

CVX/HES—I think the Ecuadorean stuff will be inconsequential to cvx even if Argentina does something nutty.

In other words, you think the kind of suit being pressed by Ecuador in Argentina won’t gain any traction in other countries where CVX has more substantial assets, correct? Even so, the market value of CVX’s assets in Argentina has been estimated at $2B, which is not exactly chump change even for a company as large as CVX.

I only own one o&g producer but i won't be buying any now 'cause I think the economy is going to tank and oil prices will drop or, at best, be flat.

Is the one you own the stock of your own company?

HES is an exception to the above, IMO; between its newfound no-wildcatting business model, its growing production in the Bakken*, its considerable buyout vig, and its modest valuation, HES would seem to have all the makings of a profitable holding even in an era of flat or slightly declining benchmark oil prices.

As a side note, HES is currently basking in positive publicity from having supplied its company-owned service stations in NJ and NY during the storm crisis, while the big oil companies with franchised service stations left their franchisees twisting in the wind.

*On the 3Q12 CC, HES said it might be cost-effective to ship Bakken crude to East Coast refineries by rail, which could be a game-changer in terms of relative pricing.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.