AI
Thursday, October 13, 2005 3:31:28 PM
Hi artguy....
I enjoy your posts and agree with alot of your thoughts..I will say this...Torvec gets criticized for trying to go in too many directions and it gets criticized for having too narrow a focus...you cant have both....personally, i feel that it is more of reality that Torvec is a company that has had limited resources financially since inception..regardless of how things are communicated by JG or anyone else and also how they are interpreted, i think your comment referencing JG's point on 'we are too small right now to pursue every path' is as much a factor as anything dictating direction...Could some things been done differently..sure..
despite miscues on several fronts, I predict monetization will occur for Torvec shareholders...no one will give a shxt what happened or how many tactical errors were made once that occurs (except the people who sold too soon or didn't buy at $1.50..LOL)....
I predict the CXO side show goes in Torvec's favor and becomes less of a distraction...I think they will do a deal of some type with Peng Pu and I believe that the now ready Iso-Torque will produce another deal....one deal validates it all and the rest falls in place....i have felt from day one that this company will be bought out, miscues and all...it's all about the tech...
I think we will see new ivt test results for the hydro-mechanical for both gas and diesel coming out and would like to think some iso-torque info would be forthcoming....
Say what you will about the personalities involved or tactical manuevers that could have been made which could have played some role in lengthening the time line to date, but some or all of Torvec's technology will be monetized to the benefit of you and I, the long-term shareholders...
thanks for sharing your thoughts...
PS - let's not forget about the short squeeze that goes with it..
I enjoy your posts and agree with alot of your thoughts..I will say this...Torvec gets criticized for trying to go in too many directions and it gets criticized for having too narrow a focus...you cant have both....personally, i feel that it is more of reality that Torvec is a company that has had limited resources financially since inception..regardless of how things are communicated by JG or anyone else and also how they are interpreted, i think your comment referencing JG's point on 'we are too small right now to pursue every path' is as much a factor as anything dictating direction...Could some things been done differently..sure..
despite miscues on several fronts, I predict monetization will occur for Torvec shareholders...no one will give a shxt what happened or how many tactical errors were made once that occurs (except the people who sold too soon or didn't buy at $1.50..LOL)....
I predict the CXO side show goes in Torvec's favor and becomes less of a distraction...I think they will do a deal of some type with Peng Pu and I believe that the now ready Iso-Torque will produce another deal....one deal validates it all and the rest falls in place....i have felt from day one that this company will be bought out, miscues and all...it's all about the tech...
I think we will see new ivt test results for the hydro-mechanical for both gas and diesel coming out and would like to think some iso-torque info would be forthcoming....
Say what you will about the personalities involved or tactical manuevers that could have been made which could have played some role in lengthening the time line to date, but some or all of Torvec's technology will be monetized to the benefit of you and I, the long-term shareholders...
thanks for sharing your thoughts...
PS - let's not forget about the short squeeze that goes with it..
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
