News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 4811
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/15/2010

Re: jpaige17 post# 17720

Monday, 09/10/2012 12:03:42 PM

Monday, September 10, 2012 12:03:42 PM

Post# of 239548
JP, hahahaha, love it! I'll be honest with you, my brain isn't all that sharp when it comes to the tech, and you know that. However, I don't think you could have made it any clearer and thank you for dumbing it down - personally, I needed that, DEFINITELY needed that. I think I remember Watts had a photo of that as well in his avatar. See, this is the problem with LQMT mgmt because, as I recall, they basically not only were unequivocal regarding the military, but I think they were in TOTAL DENIAL. That drives me a bit nuts, but they created a legal foundation of NDA's to permit themselves to say ZIP. And Red made the comment that he didn't know if it would be a high volume part to which you replied to ask LQMT mgmt who, IMO, will either say, "No," "NDA," or "we cannot confirm or deny that." Well, if they won't disclose anything else, it goes full circle to one thing, and one thing only - REAL revenues. However, this is just further proof to me that they better be showing real revenues sooner rather than later or shareholder unrest will begin.

P.S. I could see Materion assisting in this big time as I recall MTRN supplies beryllium to the military in some capacity.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News