News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257265
Next 10
Followers 36
Posts 2637
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/06/2003

Re: Rocky3 post# 145313

Wednesday, 07/11/2012 8:13:03 AM

Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:13:03 AM

Post# of 257265
Rocky

I see no reason that stocks growing at 6-7% (double the GNP growth rate over any long term period) should have a p/e over 8.



Biomaven

It's a big mistake in my view to look at a p/e (or its inverse, the earnings yield) divorced from the prevailing long term interest rate.



Rocky, in context (your statement to which Bio responded), I agree with Bio. All that is missing from Bio's statement to be complete is the future growth rate which you supplied.

Stocks are worth much more than a PE of 8 IF it is really growing* at 6-7% (long term) with 10yrT's under 2%. That is simple math.



ij

* Real grow of earnings and free cash flows.

It is astonishing what foolish things one can temporarily believe if one thinks too long alone ... where it is often impossible to bring one's ideas to a conclusive test either formal or experimental. J.M. Keynes

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today