NewStream Energy Technologies Group Inc (NSGP)

[whiplash]

I know how much everyone loves to want to slam the company for either imagined, self-interpreted, or other wrongs, and always want to hold them responsible for some wrong but the fact remains that even though the company name is still in the complaint, the complaint cleary spells out that it was Hague that directed and conducted the alleged offenses.

Not defending them, but fair is fair. The complaint clearly says that Hague (allegedly) did it and that he knew he was acting improperly.

You can browse the internet all day long and look up all the catchy phrases you want and try to make them apply and play "internet lawyer", but it doesn't prove anything and in the end this is going to come down to what Hague did or did not do. There is a reason why Hague was the only one arrested and no other arrests have teken place. If other arrests or charges were going to take place in the matter of this complaint they would have already taken place as they would have been the same offenses, and the law can not ignore some offenders yet prosecute others for the same offenses. Although the SEC case is civil, Hague was arrested and charged criminally for his alleged actions in the SEC civil case and he is the only one arrested and criminally charged.

I guess everyone to some extent loves a good conspiracy story, but its pretty well laid out in the SEC compalaint and its as simple as what the complaint outlined. There is nothing else, but i know that a year from now, 10 years from now, some people will still be pointing to this and saying the investigation is still going on simply because they love to keep some grand conspiracy going.

Sure, Hague's lawyer is going to argue others were pulling the strings and that Hague did not know what he was doing. Thats his lawyers job, he is being paid to do that, to introduce doubt, to get5 his client off. But llok at the complaint:

"IV. THE FRAUDULENT SCHEME

17. Hague stated he would "feel a lot more comfortable in a transaction with private shares" and noted "the last thing I want to be doing is trying to explain ... these large consulting agreements."

If Hague said this; Then he knew what he was doing was not proper and wanted it hidden so it would not need to be explained. Only a person aware of the consequences of their actions would say something like this.