I was one of those, back long, seems so long, ago warning that Robert might just walk with the IP.
We did look at the contract. It has an auto-renewal clause. It has escapes for non-performance. Wanderport has to be non-performing if it cannot fund anything, including complete demo units to use to get manufacturing going.
Robert has in past said he is happy with Wanderport handling the manufacturing/distribution, that his 400m shares are not the main income to him but rather it is the royalty.
As someone just said, as far as Robert walking, it would be who can pay more for legal work. If the units are there, profitably marketable, Robert could have no problem cutting a new deal and leaving the mess behind. Would it end up being as good? I guess that all depends on what is product and how good the marketing.