News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257665
Next 10
Followers 77
Posts 4790
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: biomaven0 post# 142414

Wednesday, 05/23/2012 10:14:09 AM

Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:14:09 AM

Post# of 257665

But given the drug is being given on top of active therapy, it is still unclear whether the worse outcome may not be the result of the additional tox issues causing more morbidity and/or FOLFIRI dose reductions and interruptions. To try to answer that question, you'd have to compare dose intensity and side effects in the two arms.



Agreed that, as NP pointed out as well, this is a possibility and has to be more explicitly ruled out. I have already done some of this filtering - e.g. in a previous post I note that the harm done to pfs in Met- patients in MetMab plus Tarceva is greater than the effect you'd expect if you just provided no Tarceva at all ever in that arm. I.e. it isn't just a discontinuation issue. (Obviously it could be a combo of this effect and tox so bad it is killing some patients - but again this seems unlikely.)

Other notes are that I believe, anecdotally, that traditional chemo does not show this subgroup pfs harm to anywhere near the degree it often pops up in the more targetted kinase actors. But again, I'd need to do more research to make it less anecdotal.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today