News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257684
Next 10
Followers 77
Posts 4790
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: NP1986 post# 142409

Wednesday, 05/23/2012 12:49:29 AM

Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:49:29 AM

Post# of 257684

Toxicity could also explain the effect on PFS, if it leads to early treatment discontinuation.

Treatment-related deaths would also be counted as an event for PFS, wouldn't they?



Both good questions - based upon the data I've seen (low rate of withdrawal for tox) I don't believe that is what is happening, but I'll have to do some more data mining to have more confidence in that evaluation.

Additional data to support that this is not a pfs due to withdrawal is that in some of these cases the HR is so much greater than 1 that it is greater than the HR benefit lost by early withdrawal - e.g. in MetMab with Tarceva in nsclc the HR in the Met- group was 1.82 while the pfs benefit of Tarceva alone is only about 0.70 or so. The 1.82 appears substantially worse than you'd get if you just stopped treatment.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today