News Focus
News Focus
Followers 173
Posts 20966
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 09/06/2010

Re: scion post# 25910

Tuesday, 05/22/2012 7:46:22 PM

Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:46:22 PM

Post# of 234105
In that case, it should absolutely be of interest to the SEC. If Ingham is the CFO and Bordynuik "signed" the certification, it is an incorrect certification as it was not signed by the principal financial officer. Which is a Sarbanes violation and means the 10-Q should not be considered to have been "filed" in the eyes of the SEC. Especially because the Section 302 certification appears to have been correctly "signed" by Ingham.

They will have to fix that ASAP as the SEC will likely eventually discover the error.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today