Friday, May 04, 2012 7:11:24 AM
I would agree with you, but would further submit that they were studying the tech for a year or more BEFORE they laid out 20mill for the license. Would anyone just lay out 20mill to lock it up without first doing extensive early R&D on it? Interestingly, Jobs's "scratched iphone" was supposed to have happened ALL THE WAY BACK in 2007. (And I AM aware that was the glass that was scratched, but I'm sure the back was getting scratched too and I'm sure he dropped his phone a few times too). Regardless, I think 2007 was the year Dr. Peker bolted from LQMT, as I recall. So, giving them a year or so to find something that would make the surly, hot-tempered, demanding, but revered Jobs, happy. My feeling is they have been testing liquidmetal for a much greater time than when that license fee was paid. Bottom line, we don't really know much either way, do we?
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-01-22/tech/30652107_1_foxconn-iphones-apple-executives
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-01-22/tech/30652107_1_foxconn-iphones-apple-executives
Warren Buffett spent eight years working with it before discarding it as worthless. What investment strategy is that? Technical analysis - aka CHARTS
Recent LQMT News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/08/2026 08:37:19 PM
- Liquidmetal Technologies Inc. to Present at the LD Micro Main Event XIX • Newsfile • 10/06/2025 11:30:00 AM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/13/2025 08:00:57 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/10/2025 08:02:21 PM
