Saturday, April 28, 2012 1:07:49 AM
Here are my thoughts. I think the December revenues of 250000 may have been for only a week or two or a fraction of the month. So I believe the operating rate of the 1 machine has been fairly constant.
I believe that the 400000 total from the first two bridge loans were used to cover an operating deficit of about 100,000 per month beginning in February and ending June 30.
I think the 300,000 bridge loan is for CAPEX at Visser, i.e. the addition of one more machine.
I see this as a fulfilment of STEIPP's plan to both become profitable in the third quarter AND to RAMP up CAPACITY.
I also see VISSER adding another machine at year end, leaving a total of 3 machines by beginning January, In other words, these are IOU notes from STEIPP to VISSER, or if you will, an advance against future sales.
So I am going to suggest that the company has been producing an average monthly revenue between 900 to 950 K per month for the last 6 months. I also believe they have been operating at near capacity cycle wise.
If the bridge loan is for the purchase of the machine upon delivery, I believe that the Engel #2 machine has been shipped or soon will be and will be operational late June early July. JUST MY HUMBLE OPINION.
I am also going to assume, that with the addition of the second machine, we will probably operate at 85% to 90 % capacity to be on the safe side, so I foresee revenues in the 2nd half approaching 1.5 to 1.7
million per month.
GO AT IT YOU FINANCIAL GENIUSES. FIGURE IT OUT.
on a forward looking annualized basis, I change my PPS projections to be 20 million annualized in earnings beginning June 30 with a 13 PE ratio and outstanding of 190,000,000 shares to get an estimated $1.36 per share.
I think this is a valid set of assumptions, but on the conservative side as far as the PE Ratio. Some believe it should be 20. In such a case the PPS would be closer to $2.10. I remember that someone had made a projection of 2.65 PPS. However, I believe that was overly optimistic. There may have been a slippage of 3 months on the PERT diagram in getting the second machine due to the necessity to tweak the melt, vaccuum and NC systems to optimize production. I think this makes some compromise between $1.36 and 2.10 a possibility. I am going to say about $1.75 PPS as my best hunch.
Coincidently, that equals the spike up we had when the Apple deal was announced. I think this is purely a co-incidence or, possibly, a DIVINE OMEN sent 1-1/2 years ago. LOL.
I do hope someone else who is an expert can make a far more accurate projection. TEE HEE
I believe that the 400000 total from the first two bridge loans were used to cover an operating deficit of about 100,000 per month beginning in February and ending June 30.
I think the 300,000 bridge loan is for CAPEX at Visser, i.e. the addition of one more machine.
I see this as a fulfilment of STEIPP's plan to both become profitable in the third quarter AND to RAMP up CAPACITY.
I also see VISSER adding another machine at year end, leaving a total of 3 machines by beginning January, In other words, these are IOU notes from STEIPP to VISSER, or if you will, an advance against future sales.
So I am going to suggest that the company has been producing an average monthly revenue between 900 to 950 K per month for the last 6 months. I also believe they have been operating at near capacity cycle wise.
If the bridge loan is for the purchase of the machine upon delivery, I believe that the Engel #2 machine has been shipped or soon will be and will be operational late June early July. JUST MY HUMBLE OPINION.
I am also going to assume, that with the addition of the second machine, we will probably operate at 85% to 90 % capacity to be on the safe side, so I foresee revenues in the 2nd half approaching 1.5 to 1.7
million per month.
GO AT IT YOU FINANCIAL GENIUSES. FIGURE IT OUT.
on a forward looking annualized basis, I change my PPS projections to be 20 million annualized in earnings beginning June 30 with a 13 PE ratio and outstanding of 190,000,000 shares to get an estimated $1.36 per share.
I think this is a valid set of assumptions, but on the conservative side as far as the PE Ratio. Some believe it should be 20. In such a case the PPS would be closer to $2.10. I remember that someone had made a projection of 2.65 PPS. However, I believe that was overly optimistic. There may have been a slippage of 3 months on the PERT diagram in getting the second machine due to the necessity to tweak the melt, vaccuum and NC systems to optimize production. I think this makes some compromise between $1.36 and 2.10 a possibility. I am going to say about $1.75 PPS as my best hunch.
Coincidently, that equals the spike up we had when the Apple deal was announced. I think this is purely a co-incidence or, possibly, a DIVINE OMEN sent 1-1/2 years ago. LOL.
I do hope someone else who is an expert can make a far more accurate projection. TEE HEE
Recent LQMT News
- Liquidmetal Technologies Inc. to Present at the LD Micro Main Event XIX • Newsfile • 10/06/2025 11:30:00 AM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/13/2025 08:00:57 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/10/2025 08:02:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/29/2025 08:02:37 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/13/2025 08:06:09 PM
