InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,308.13
(
0.00%
)
US TECH 100
18,152.07
(
-0.24%
)
Dow Jones
39,806.77
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
82.41
(
-1.34%
)
Bitcoin
71,354.09
(
-0.13%
)
Post# of 17378
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

8-blacksheep

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 50
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/27/2012

8-blacksheep

Re: cephas7 post# 17261

Friday, 02/10/2012 3:48:58 PM

Friday, February 10, 2012 3:48:58 PM

Post# of 17378
Yes, agree with you 100 percent. I am as upset and angry as you are about all this.

So many things went wrong that could have made a huge difference. I don't understand why the DAC litigation didn't go to the FCC for them to make the decision. All other DAC cases that are very similar have gone before FCC with favorable outcome. Try to keep the DAC cases in federal court and then trying to get these high priced litigators to settle the cases in short time was just a terrible decision for shareholders.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up