Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
News; $MOBL MobileIron to Be Acquired by Ivanti to Secure Every Endpoint and Power the Everywhere Enterprise
Transaction Creates World-Class Market Leader in Unified Endpoint Management, Zero Trust Security and Enterprise Service Management with Most Comprehensive Set of Solutions MobileIron (NASDAQ:MOBL), the mobile-centric security platform for the Everywhere Enterprise, toda...
In case you are interested MOBL - MobileIron to Be Acquired by Ivanti to Secure Every Endpoint and Power the Everywhere Enterprise
News; $MOBL Why MobileIron Stock Just Popped 13%
Shares of MobileIron (NASDAQ: MOBL) are hot as a frying pan this morning, rising 13.5% through 10:45 a.m. EDT, after Bloomberg reported that the company may be seeking a sale. MobileIron, which provides cybersecurity for mobile devices, has not yet confirmed the news, and even Bloomb...
In case you are interested MOBL - Why MobileIron Stock Just Popped 13%
I posted this on zip changers. Going throught old memories this entry in MOBL is pretty painfull. I remenber the acquisition of Kite Broadband gave me the highest boost of confidence. Jerry Sullivan, the billionair came on board. All down the toilet. damn! What happened to that guy?
imo, Jay cashed out before letting shareholders know anything.
I did not hear anything from my SEC complaint of Nov. 2014. It looked to me that the assets of MOBL went to another company. Now that company is bankrupt. We can not win for losing. Many things were said to keep us invested, just so others could cash out,IMO.
Did you ever got a response for your query? Do you know what happened to the stock?
What is taking so long for the SEC to investigate this security? Complaints have been filed over two years ago.
NASDAQ: MOBL MobileIron Inc. $8.90
Jay finally came thru, LOL.
goldie - i just came across your reply. have you followed the NUTT board? looks like a crony of Jay's. kind of ridiculous replies/posts about the past doesnt matter, they have turned over an new leaf, yada yada.
did you ever file a complaint with the SEC? if not - i would urge you to do so. i can not prove it is criminal but it is certainly suspect and without getting access to the financials (of course by now they have probably scrubbed them) - it cant be proven.
that being said - somehow they went from being non shareholders to controlling the company while it was in a dark period. that is not allowed and they are able to be sued for doing so.
2. Stockholders may bring litigation against the board of directors for, among other things, (a) breach of fiduciary duty caused by decreased liquidity and trading price resulting from “going dark,” if that in fact occurs, (b) insider trading by officers and directors on the basis of material non-public information (because no periodic reports have been filed or adequate information released), or (c) repurchases by the corporation on the basis of material non-public information.
http://www.dorsey.com/going_dark_voluntary_delisting_deregistration/
i encourage you to file a formal complaint with the SEC and encourage any others you know that were caught up in this. i highlighted the share differential when NUTT provided limited disclosure to pinksheets.com.
I wish I had all the old emails (2004-2007) from Jay-boy, many of his responses turned out to be flat-out lies, as far as the MLOG situation, I had no idea. Most of these ex-CEO's were lawyers
who milked the OTC to their financial gains, imo. I do know Jay was a very busy man w/Bayberry and such and being a part-time CEO for MOBL that needed a full time CEO...
look at filing for NUTT on pinksheets.com
MOBL originally owned 3.7MM shares of MLOG and on the reporting for NUTT (which MLOG did a reverse spin off to create) it shows that MOBL owns 1.7MM shares (i think). However, both Wright and Meccarelli are majority owners of NUTT even though neither ever had a reported position in MLOG despite being COB and CEO of MLOG. further, MLOG has had numerous IP suits that they appear to have been successful on since they keep suing and using the same venue and past rulings as reason to fast track the cases and keep the venue the same.
MLOG never reported financials after 2004 and never reported any reorg or restructuring. so - how did Wright and Meccarelli become 5%/majority shareholders of MLOG without reporting and/or where did the votes come from for the reverse merger/spin off into NUTT? since several shareholders were pressuring the two for financials and reporting on these results - the timing is VERY suspect and the continued refusal/ignoring of shareholders to get MLOG financials (now a private company) is a MAJOR RED FLAG. further, for MOBL shareholders - what was Wright's part in this whole deal when he was CEO of MOBL and COB for MLOG?!
this reeks. do your homework/DD and if you feel the same, file a complaint with the SEC.
I sold back in 2006 and 2007 before the demise occurred.
I was here when MOBL touched .41.
I remember the days of making thousands here...
Looks as if Mobilepro isn't trading anymore.
MLOG EXPLODING =BIG VOLUME -GO MOBL
you should have some mlog coming to you
I own worthless pieces of paper stock certificates
with the name MobilePro Corp. (fka MOBL).
just because your dog was deregistered doesn"t meen you don"t own it
For what reason, and we aren't shareholders of MOBL
anymore, are we?
Stock was deregistered.
ARE MLOG shares to be distributed to mobl shareholders ???
Jay Wright said $100M revenue by this time.
Instead, our shares are worthless.
Good Bye MOBL. I have been here since 2001, like a lot of you. We had hoped for a better outcome. I learned: if the Directors jump ship, the ship is sinking. IMO, it looks like someone got away with what was left of MOBL. We will likely never find out...
thanx Renee, had a feeling this was coming
but didn't sell 1 share. Oh well.
GL to you.
Hi, Harr. Yes, it does seem to be S.O.P. by the SEC to quickly revoke stocks that do not immediately comply to an SEC Admin Proceeding.
MobilePro and the 530 other stocks that have been revoked in the last 2 years should know that the SEC doesn't fool around when they give formal notice to each company.
We go back a long way, Harr, so I wish the best to you!!
WE CAN ASK JOE BIDEN- HE SEEMS TO KNOW THE ANSWER TO EVERYTHING WHY NOT THIS??
can anyone tell me how this revoke on mobl will effect the mlog and how we get our shares as mobl owners.
thanks
MOBL ...revoke the registration of each class of registered securities of Respondents.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 66693/ March 30, 2012
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-14767
________________________________________
In the Matter of :
:
JETRONIC INDUSTRIES, INC. (n/k/a NEW : ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND
BASTION DEVELOPMENT, INC.), : REVOKING REGISTRATIONS BY
LIONS PETROLEUM, INC. (n/k/a CHINA : DEFAULT AS TO THREE
HONGXING AGRITECH, INC.), : RESPONDENTS
MDI, INC., and :
MOBILEPRO CORP. :
________________________________________
The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) instituted this proceeding with an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings (OIP) on February 23, 2012, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The OIP alleges that Lions
Petroleum, Inc. (n/k/a China Hongxing Agritech, Inc.) (Lions Petroleum), MDI, Inc. (MDI), and MobilePro Corp. (MobilePro) (collectively, Respondents) have repeatedly failed to file timely periodic reports with the Commission, in violation of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder.1
The Office of the Secretary and the Division of Enforcement have provided evidence that Respondents were served with the OIP by February 27, 2012. See 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.141(a)(2)(ii), (iv). To date, Respondents have not filed Answers, which were due by March
12, 2012. OIP at 3; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.160, .220(b). On March 13, 2012, Respondents were
ordered to show cause, by March 22, 2012, why the registrations of their securities should not be revoked by default. A telephonic prehearing conference was held on March 22, 2012, at which Respondents did not appear.
Respondents are in default for failing to file Answers, appear at the prehearing
conference, or otherwise defend the proceeding. 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), .220(f), .221(f).
Accordingly, as authorized by Rule 155(a) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, I find the
following allegations in the OIP to be true.
1 Jetronic Industries, Inc. (n/k/a New Bastion Development, Inc.), filed its Answer on March 19,
2012, and remains in the proceeding.
Lions Petroleum (CIK No. 1048407) is a void Delaware corporation located in Harbin,
Heilongjiang Province, China, with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant
to Exchange Act Section 12(g). Lions Petroleum is delinquent in its periodic filings with the
Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2007, which reported a net loss of $119,137 for the prior three months. As
of February 14, 2012, the company’s stock (symbol “LPET”) was quoted on OTC Link, had
eight market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule
15c2-11(f)(3).
MDI (CIK No. 318259) is a void Delaware corporation located in San Antonio, Texas,
with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section
12(g). MDI is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any
periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009. As of
February 14, 2012, the company’s stock (symbol “MDIZQ”) was quoted on OTC Link, had eight
market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-
11(f)(3).
MobilePro (CIK No. 769592) is a Delaware corporation located in Gaithersburg,
Maryland, with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act
Section 12(g). MobilePro is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not
filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009, which
reported an operating loss of over $10.6 million for the prior twelve months. As of February 14,
2012, the company’s stock (symbol “MOBL”) was quoted on OTC Link, had ten market makers,
and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
In addition to repeated failures to file timely periodic reports, Respondents have failed to
heed delinquency letters sent to them by the Division of Corporation Finance requesting
compliance with their periodic filing obligations or, through their failure to maintain a valid
address on file with the Commission as required by Commission rules, did not receive such
letters.
Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder require issuers
of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file with the Commission
current and accurate information in periodic reports, even if the registration is voluntary under
Section 12(g). Specifically, Rule 13a-1 requires issuers to file annual reports, and Rule 13a-13
requires domestic issuers to file quarterly reports. 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.13a-1, -13.
As a result of the foregoing, Respondents have failed to comply with Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. Considering these delinquencies, it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to revoke the registration of each class
of registered securities of Respondents.
2
Knew revocation of shares was coming.
Seems SOP with SEC lately.
Justice the mlog seems to be lost, it is not in our accounts so please explain how it effects us or what are we to do to get our share.
thanks
MLOG READY TO EXPLODE =HUGE CONTRACTS NOW ON THE WAY== MOBL OWNS A TOTAL OF 65%
mobl owned 35 Percent of mlog, is there not anybody out there that can tell me where our stock went to. I have my letters prepared for sec 4:oclock today is the end for me. I plan to rain letters every where till i get info.
thanks
MOBL volume 100K, .0002.
mlog starting to pop
What's the reason to buy?
Trading on grey market, no business operations, no transparency regarding recent court case vs. AT&T.
Y ISN"T IT TRADING??
if trading was suspended thru march 7th=is it now after the 14th unsuspended
it is now march 14th=the seventh has come and gone
Trading is suspended through 11:59 p.m. EST on March 7, 2012.
do we start trading tomorrow as planned??
Then we wonder if SEC will deregister MOBL stock,
"harr449 Friday, February 24, 2012 8:13:22 AM
Re: None
Post # of 17331
A stock I own had it's shares "revoked"
(deregistered) 2 wks. after a trading suspension".
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72483084
only 2 more days till the big decision
No limitations on selling, if you can. Actually,
I bought a stock one time below at .00005, with .0001 as limit price.
Only way we'll be able to tell what to buy or sell for is by watching the actual trade prices.
MOBL Share price can not go any lower, so what are the limitation at selling shares at .0001?
If Mr. Sledge can not account for the MLOG shares, then this needs to be investigated to determine what entity or person has them. Also, there needs to be an explanation as to why the MLOG shares were taken.
His purchase of MOBL shares was nothing more than a ploy to convince shareholders that everything was legitimate on his part. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that he was shorting shares through YAG in some off-shore company. Don't forget, Jay was the one who tried to say that issuing hundreds of millions of shares was the right thing to do to pay down debt.
My complaint is Jay Wright's financial predictions
for MOBL, $100M revenue.
Followers
|
161
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
17378
|
Created
|
04/23/03
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
MOBILEPRO CORPORATION
COMPANY WEBSITES OFFLINE AND COMPANY BUSINESS OPERATIONS TERMINATED.
MARCH 30, 2012
MobilePro (CIK No. 769592) is a Delaware corporation located in Gaithersburg,
Maryland, with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act
Section 12(g). MobilePro is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not
filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009, which
reported an operating loss of over $10.6 million for the prior twelve months. As of February 14,
2012, the company's stock (symbol "MOBL") was quoted on OTC Link, had ten market makers,
and was eligible for the "piggyback" exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
In addition to repeated failures to file timely periodic reports, Respondents have failed to
heed delinquency letters sent to them by the Division of Corporation Finance requesting
compliance with their periodic filing obligations or, through their failure to maintain a valid
address on file with the Commission as required by Commission rules, did not receive such
letters.
Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder require issuers
of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file with the Commission
current and accurate information in periodic reports, even if the registration is voluntary under
Section 12(g). Specifically, Rule 13a-1 requires issuers to file annual reports, and Rule 13a-13
requires domestic issuers to file quarterly reports. 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.13a-1, -13.
As a result of the foregoing, Respondents have failed to comply with Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. Considering these delinquencies, it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to revoke the registration of each class of registered securities of Respondents.
http://www.mobileprocorp.com/
Whois Record For MobileProCorp.com
Record last updated on 05-Nov-2010.
Record expires on 20-Mar-2011.
Record created on 20-Mar-2003.
http://whois.domaintools.com/mobileprocorp.com
http://progamesnetwork.com/ProGamesMain.aspx
Internet Archive Wayback Machine: web.archive.org/
Latest snapshot of Mobileprocorp.com website is April 2009.
VS.
Headquartered in Alexandria, VA, the American Public Communications Council is the national trade association representing the owners, suppliers, and manufacturers of public communications products and services. APCC is dedicated to supporting a public communications environment that promotes the widest deployment of payphones for the use of the American public".
www.apcc.net/i4a/pages/index.cfm
1:99-cv-00696-ESH APCC SERVICES INC, et al v. AT&T CORPORATION
Ellen S. Huvelle, presiding
Date filed: 03/19/1999
District of Columbia
| Complaint | ||||
Docket Text: COMPLAINT filed by plaintiff APCC SERVICES INC, plaintiff DATA NET SYSTEMS LLC, plaintiff JAROTH INC, plaintiff NSC TELEMANAGEMENT, plaintiff DAVEL COMMUNICATIONS, plaintiff PEOPLES TELEPHONE CO; jury demand; Exhibits (5) (tth) |
Filed: 05/18/2001
Entered: 05/25/2001
Order
Docket Text: ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: appointing Honorable Richard A. Levie as Special Master (N) (gdf)
Hon. Richard A. Levie (Ret.)
Special Master/Disc'y Referee
APCC Services, Inc. et al. v. AT&T Corporation, Sprint, and Qwest, (Huvelle, J., D.D.C.) - Special Master for discovery and privilege in a series of telecommunication cases between telephone companies and owners of payphones over the proper amount of compensation due
http://tinyurl.com/3rnqstz
Post #16684 - 03/25/2011 to 04/22/2011 http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=62475533
Post #16518 - 03/05/2010 to 11/19/2010 http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=57566225
Post #16167 - 03/19/1999 to 09/29/2009 http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=45645435
149 |
| Motion to Disqualify Counsel | ||
Docket Text: MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Albert Kramer and Oral Hearing by AT&T CORPORATION (Attachments: # (1) Declaration Declaration of D Stark, # (2) Declaration Declaration of P Phillips, # (3) Declaration Declaration of B Byrd, # (4) Declaration Declaration of K Krom, # (5) Exhibit A, # (6) Exhibit B, # (7) Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Panner, Aaron). Added MOTION for Hearing on 5/11/2011 (jf, ). |
Filed & Entered: | 03/26/2011 |
Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice
Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER granting [138] Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice: upon consideration of plaintiffs' motion for admission of attorney Steve W. Berman pro hac vice, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney Steve W. Berman is admitted pro hac vice for the purpose of appearing in the above-captioned case. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on March 26, 2011.(AG)
Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER granting [139] Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice: upon consideration of plaintiffs' motion for admission of attorney Jennifer Fountain Connolly pro hac vice, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney Jennifer Fountain Connolly is admitted pro hac vice for the purpose of appearing in the above-captioned case. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on March 26, 2011.
Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER granting [140] Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice: upon consideration of plaintiffs' motion for admission of attorney Jeff D. Friedman pro hac vice, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney Jeff D. Friedman is admitted pro hac vice for the purpose of appearing in the above-captioned case. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on March 26, 2011.
Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER granting [141] Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice: upon consideration of plaintiffs' motion for admission of attorney Jason A. Zweig pro hac vice, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney Jason A. Zweig is admitted pro hac vice for the purpose of appearing in the above-captioned case. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on March 26, 2011.
Filed & Entered: 03/25/2011
Docket Text: MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name - Steve W. Berman, :Firm- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, :Address- 1918 8th Avenue, Suite 3300, Seattle, Washington 98101. Phone No. - 206-623-7292. Fax No. - 206-623-0594 by APCC SERVICES INC (Attachments: # (1) Declaration, # (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, William)
Docket Text: MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jennifer Fountain Connolly, :Firm- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, :Address- 1629 K St., NW, Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20006. Phone No. - (202) 355-6435. Fax No. - (202) 355-6455 by APCC SERVICES INC (Attachments: # (1) Declaration, # (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, William)
Docket Text: MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jeff D. Friedman, :Firm- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, :Address- 715 Hearst Ave., Suite 202, Berkeley, CA 94710. Phone No. - (510) 725-3000. Fax No. - (510) 725-3001 by APCC SERVICES INC (Attachments: # (1) Declaration, # (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, William)
Docket Text: MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jason A. Zweig, :Firm- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, :Address- One Penn Plaza, 36th Floor, New York, NY 10119. Phone No. - (212) 752-5455. Fax No. - (917) 210-3980 by APCC SERVICES INC (Attachments: # (1) Declaration, # (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, William)
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP - www.hbsslaw.com/home/
Based in Seattle, Washington, Hagens Berman LLP was founded in 1993 by Carl Hagens and Steve Berman with one purpose - to pursue the type of law that most interested the founders. This involved representing plaintiffs in class actions and multi-party, large-scale complex litigation and becoming engaged in cases that had the potential for having a positive impact on protecting the rights of investors, consumers, workers, innovators and the environment.
Since then, the firm has stayed true to that purpose and become one of the nation's leading firms in these fields, earning an international reputation for excellence and innovation.
Our main focus is to represent plaintiffs in securities, investment fraud, product liability, tort, antitrust, consumer fraud, employment, environmental, intellectual property and ERISA cases. In doing so, our firm has become particularly skilled at managing multi-state and nationwide class actions through an organized, coordinated approach that implements an efficient and aggressive prosecutorial strategy in order to place maximum pressure on the defendant.
A large part of our success is due to the excellent group of attorneys whose expertise and talent set them apart. The firm recognized two of its senior partners, Thomas Sobol and Anthony Shapiro, for their outstanding contributions and leadership. And in February 2005, the firm ushered in a new era by unveiling a new name - Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.
At Hagens Berman we all work towards the same goal - protecting the rights of our clients, whether they are consumers, investors, workers or stewards of the environment. Over the years, we've expanded our national reach to better serve our clients. Since the firm's founding in 1993, we've developed a successful and far-reaching network of branch offices in Phoenix, Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, Colorado Springs and Washington, D.C.
Founded in 1995, our Phoenix office has driven important litigation and has a strong legal presence in Arizona and the southwest. Shortly thereafter in 1996, we founded the Los Angeles office, which manages our significant case load in California.
In June 2002, our firm opened an office in Boston. This office leads our drug litigation efforts, challenging the prices of dozens of prescription drugs, and claiming that manufacturers artificially drove up drug prices through numerous anti-competitive practices.
In another step to become the nation's premier law firm in class-action and large-scale litigation, we created a Chicago branch in 2004. The firm first created a presence among the Illinois legal and political scene with the landmark litigation against the tobacco industry, in which Steve Berman served as special assistant attorney general for the state.
We opened our sixth national and second California office in San Francisco in 2007. The second California office is a reflection of our continuing growth in one of the most vibrant parts of the country. Having offices in Los Angeles and San Francisco will help ensure our firm is on the leading edge of important social and governmental change within the legal landscape.
In 2010, we opened offices in Washington D.C. and Colorado Springs, Colorado, and the following year, opened offices in New York and Minneapolis.
www.hbsslaw.com/our-firm/about-us
APCC Services, Inc., et al. v. AT&T Corp. AND APCC Services, Inc., et al. v. Qwest Corp.
Levetown & Jenkins, LLP is counsel for APCC Services, Inc., a billing clearinghouse for payphone service providers ("PSPs"), in separate actions against AT&T Corp. and Qwest Corp. for non-payment of fees for so-called "dial-around-calls." The actions allege that the defendants unlawfully failed to pay the PSPs dial-around fees at rates set by the FCC. These companion cases, filed in the District for the District of Columbia, had previously been appealed to the Supreme Court on the issues of standing and a right to a private cause of action against the defendants for failing to adhere to FCC rates. Subsequent to its victories in the Supreme Court, APCC retained Levetown & Jenkins, LLP to represent it to finally resolve these cases after a decade of litigation. Levetown & Jenkins was able to settle Qwest case in April 2011 within weeks of being retained as counsel. Levetown & Jenkins is working in conjunction with Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP for this engagement.
http://tinyurl.com/3npcokf
http://levjen.com/index.php/practice/
VS.
Case APCC SERVICES, INC., et al v. QWEST COMM CORP, et al
District of Columbia
Ellen S. Huvelle, presiding
Date filed: 03/23/2001
Date terminated: 03/25/2011
Date of last filing: 04/27/2011
Document 58 Filed 04/27/11
Joint Stipulation and Order of Dismissal
http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/kbqfa
Albert H. Kramer
AMERICAN PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL
625 Slaters Lane
Suite 100
Alexandria, VA 22315
(703) 739-1322 x228
(703) 739-1324 (fax)
kramera@dicksteinshapiro.com
Assigned: 08/09/2007
LEAD ATTORNEY representing APCC SERVICES, INC.
(Plaintiff)
Leslie R. Cohen
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-5403
(202) 420-2225
(202) 420-2201 (fax)
cohenl@dicksteinshapiro.com
Assigned: 09/07/2007
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED representing APCC SERVICES, INC.
(Plaintiff)
April 1, 2011 - CenturyLink and Qwest Complete Merger
http://www.centurylinkqwestmerger.com/index.php?page=news
Jay Wright, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
On Sept. 20, 2010, it was unofficially reported (see email below) that CEO Jay Wright left MobilePro Corp. and is now working elsewhere.
From Yahoo message board by "crashfree60":
"New Ceo 20-Sep-10 03:24 pm
Here is a message from Jay Wright I got today:
Hi "crashfree"- I am no longer with Mobilepro.
With respect to your questions, I believe MOBL still owns MLOG shares. On the lawsuit, I do not know as I have been gone for 6 1/2 weeks now so I can't reasonably comment.
Regards,
Jay Wright"
investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx
Jay Wright President at Bayberry Capital, Inc.
Location
Washington D.C. Metro Area
Industry
Venture Capital & Private Equity
Current
* President at Bayberry Capital, Inc.
* CFO at Blackridge Technology Holdings, Inc.
* Director at Vought Defense Systems, Inc.
* Chairman at Microlog Corporation
* Adjunct Professor of Finance at Georgetown University
Past
* Chairman and CEO at Mobilepro
* Chairman at ProGames Network, Inc.
* President at Bayberry Capital, Inc.
Source: linkedin.com
April 26, 2011 Press Release Excerpt - "The ALAS Board of Directors also accepted the resignation of Jay O. Wright as a Director of ALAS, effective April 9, 2011".
finance.yahoo.com/news/ALAS-Signs-Contract-to-pz-2646466833.html
Tammy L. Martin Tammy Martin joined us in November 2004 as the General Counsel of Davel and was promoted to Chief Executive Officer of Davel in May 2005. In April 2006 Ms. Martin was promoted to Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Vice President of the Company. In November 2006 Ms. Martin was promoted to General Counsel of the Company. Prior to the acquisition of Davel in November 2004, Ms. Martin served in various positions, including General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer. Ms. Martin received a Bachelors of Business Administration degree from Baldwin Wallace College and a JD degree from Cleveland State University.
APCC Board of Directors
Tammy Martin
MobilePro Corp.
Cleveland Heights, OH
http://www.apcc.net/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=10
MOBILEPRO CORP. | |||
Date: August 6, 2009 | By: | /s/ Jay O. Wright | |
Jay O. Wright Chief Executive Officer Mobilepro Corp. |
July 2, 2009 Form 8-K
Item 8.01. Other Events.
(d) | Exhibits |
10.1 | Note Payable dated June 30, 2009 between Mobilepro Corp. and L. William Fogg, Nationwide Acquisition Corp. and Unified Communication Corporation |
MOBILEPRO CORP. | |||
Date: July 2, 2009 | By: | /s/ Jay O. Wright | |
Jay O. Wright Chief Executive Officer Mobilepro Corp. |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |