News Focus
News Focus
Followers 168
Posts 20753
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 08/09/2000

Re: bob41 post# 71271

Monday, 08/01/2005 7:44:10 PM

Monday, August 01, 2005 7:44:10 PM

Post# of 286880
The Net Cap Req was just for the trades that had occurred prior to the suspension was it not? Still seems like there is a big problem with MAMG that the regulators have to address at some point? Agreed? You certainly seem correct about the magnitude- With 138K short admitted in PR (+ any MMs- likely another 40K) and BCIT maybe 400M shares on a float of 2.5M or so (51% insider) is only a 160 magnitude. Still HUGE but nnot nearly the GVRP/MAMG problem.

The BIG difference does seem to be the CEO in the case of BCIT is concerned about shareholders. Geez, he didnt thank us for being patient, etc. Ha Ha Ha - Due to his actions he rocks and with GVRP we get constant thank yous while the CEO is trying to wiggle out of the mess and screw us.


Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today