News Focus
News Focus

F6

Followers 59
Posts 34538
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/02/2003

F6

Re: ordinarydude post# 165092

Monday, 01/09/2012 6:23:59 PM

Monday, January 09, 2012 6:23:59 PM

Post# of 575316
ordinarydude -- I believe(?) that even using one or even several of our nuke bunker-busters, the (far) larger release could/would come from the (presumably much) greater radioactive mass of the on-site materials -- a release also in play if we proceed with non-nuclear means -- if we are going to go after that target, whatever we use will have to be able to do the job -- here's hoping you're correct that our other (kinetic/penetrating or explosive/concussive or both) (our nuke bunker-busters are both, of course, deep-penetrate then detonate) non-nuke options are up to it -- would be just the job for that hypersonic kinetic system ([linked in] http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=66091098 and preceding and following) they've been trying to get going



Greensburg, KS - 5/4/07

"Eternal vigilance is the price of Liberty."
from John Philpot Curran, Speech
upon the Right of Election, 1790


F6

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today