InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252785
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: ghmm post# 133413

Tuesday, 12/20/2011 4:45:57 PM

Tuesday, December 20, 2011 4:45:57 PM

Post# of 252785

SLXP/PGNX: I would like to see the data to better understand it. I am not as familiar with their sub-q product to easily compare with NKTR. The secondary end point is what would be a meaningful comparison. Not saying the data are bad but I don't see any p values or hard numbers (things are very vaguely worded) which would make me cautious if I were long.

I would imagine, as is sometimes the case, that they are saving the full detailed data for a 2012 medical conference (as alluded to in the PR). The PR makes it very clear that they will be submitting an NDA based on this data; doesn't really seem to be much wiggle room in that. So, I imagine there is confidence that this data supports approval of oral Relistor in this patient population (chronic, non-cancer). I think it's clearly this indication, not subQ, that NKTR needs to be more worried about from a competitive standpoint.

Keep in mind that PGNX is due 15-19% royalty rate on U.S. sales of Relistor from SLXP ( #msg-62151367 ).
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.