News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 238
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/27/2011

Re: crookedneck post# 37301

Monday, 12/19/2011 2:13:24 PM

Monday, December 19, 2011 2:13:24 PM

Post# of 48341
I agree 100%....

Like I said all along, CGAQ sometimes is too transparent. Providing information in Pinkyland is almost unheard of prior to activating a project path. I have seen other Pinkies in mining, that announce major projects, then bust because they paint too rosey of a picture - so it is not unheard of.

Remember the major auto companies announcing a major rollout of electric cars years and years ago, sometimes projects take a longterm outlook, before they happen..

And if the parties involved, whether partners, or prospects read all this negativity on this board..... am sure it will derail some projects.

If one is not happy with CGAQ, I agree with you, they should move on...

IMO
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BSEM News