Why do you suppose the main defendants have requested a hearing? It wouldn't be my first recourse unless I had nothing to hide. Just food for thought.
Where does it say that the court gave AMF permission to serve WDRP by means of public media? Do you have an legal reference you might provide as to the legality in Canada or Quebec of serving subpoenas in this way in securities law? I'm confused as to how WDRP is legally involved and apparently so is WDRP from their PR about it, which I would suspect went through legal counsel before being published.
It looks like much of the information you posted is open to interpretation of the reader, yet legal interpretation is all that matters.
You may be right...don't misunderstand me, but so might the "Bulls" be from the info you post.
In the absence of that which is not, that which is, is not.
