Saturday, October 29, 2011 10:25:41 AM
My fear is that SNY made the calculation that they would do much better with an AG in the market than they were doing without it, and would have come into the market aggressively anyway
Why didn't they do so earlier? I think that is a powerful statement of their intent. Might their intent have changed? Possibly - but I'd say it is far from a certainty. My WAG is that mL keeps greater than 40% market share. Say $800M or better
PS and FWIW my calcs are:
mL keeps $1B sales, GM=68%, Momenta Revenues=$269M, Momenta Earnings=$110M
mL keeps $800M sales, GM=64%, Momenta Revenues=$195M, Momenta Earnings=$62M
mL keeps $600M sales, GM=60%, Momenta Revenues=$128M, Momenta Earnings=$18M
(Assumed 35% tax rate and $100M/Yr operating costs at Momenta)
Cannabix Technologies Announces First Delivery of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) to a Major Construction Client • BLOZF • Mar 19, 2026 12:45 PM
ECGI Building in Crypto's Top-Performing Sector as Tokenized Real-World Assets Surge Past $26 Billion • ECGI • Mar 19, 2026 8:30 AM
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
