IMO, I believe, Maybe, Looks like, truly doubt. Give some meat on that bone Sandy!
It's likely a signal that the SEC and FINRA may be continuing its investigation of ANWM and looking at taking further action against the company and possibly some of the people involved??? <---what? You really think that the SEC has yet again wasted even more of its idle time on an empty shell with no disclosed assets?? I "believe" Sandy that you are thinking of those big bad dilution machines that pump, dump & increase a/s & o/s count. Remember how this one got updated in 1/2011 & again in 6/2011 with no change. Remember???? Remember how it got done immediately after the bulk-17 suspension??
ANWM doesn't have money to pay for an attorney <---- & you've come up with this deduction how??? by NVSOS income tier reporting a shell company prior to asset? I am just taking guesses with where you are coming from with that 'way-out there' "opinion you've formed."
I truly doubt this attorney was hired to help AMWM find a sponsoring MM or correspond with FINRA to get the stock off of the grey market. <---well then that would have not even needed to be pr'd Sandy, right. Please don't tell me that it's to "encourage new shareholders to buy" after this alleged sec "serious investigation" far-fetched scenario that you've throw at me. IF ANWM is in such sky-is-falling hot water, then why would they pr hiring a DONALD RETT?? What's the benefit to them or to shareholders. You just said, yourself, that you "believe" it's an sec lawsuit. So, anwm wants to pump & dump while under investigation???? You know, I am from the "if it doesn't make sense, it's usually not true." Your theory is really not too solid at all.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
