Gee Janice. I do not know. But the question on hand is why would Ken Ash retain such a high powered attorney if Ken Ash is simply a "sleazy sanctioned broker" (in your words) who was running a non-salvageable grey sheet stock & a "dirty shell" with intent to just perform a pump & dump???
Because he has a lot to lose?
Have any idea who Mr. Rett is?
Since I posted a link to his website, I think you can assume I do.
Now why would Mr. Rett accept retainer & representation on a pump & dump with no assets & no intent to insert assets from a sleazy sanctioned broker??
Because he's a securities lawyer now working in the private sector. As long as he's paid, he'll give it his best effort.
Why do you keep calling me "Janet"? Far as I know, no "Janet" has ever posted here.