InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253125
Next 10
Followers 839
Posts 120436
Boards Moderated 18
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biomaven0 post# 128252

Tuesday, 10/11/2011 3:35:24 PM

Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:35:24 PM

Post# of 253125

Obviously each fact pattern is different, but I don't think I've ever heard of a double-digit settlement. Can you point to one?

One that comes immediately to mind is the Tercica-INSM case, in which INSM paid Tercica a 20% royalty on sales above $100M and 15% on the first $100M. The issue in that case was whether INSM was infringing on the process claims in Genenetch’s 6,331,414 patent (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,331,414.PN.&OS=PN/6,331,414&RS=PN/6,331,414 ), which was licensed to Tercica.

This was technically a judgment rather than a settlement, but INSM did not appeal the ruling, so the judgment was tantamount to a settlement.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.