News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257269
Next 10
Followers 28
Posts 5148
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/24/2006

Re: biomaven0 post# 128022

Sunday, 10/09/2011 5:10:24 AM

Sunday, October 09, 2011 5:10:24 AM

Post# of 257269
I certainly agree with your view that exaggerating Section 271(e)(1) beyond the intent of the law would make the value of patents like Momenta's worth a lot less (using iwfal's words #msg-67816773). Still, from previous cases where utilizing patented techniques was allowed so long as it was related to gaining data for FDA approval for an ANDA, seems to me it is within the scope of Section 271(e)(1). Btw, Momenta will probably use the Bolar Provision in the Copaxone case (#msg-59195596).



Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today