InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252254
Next 10
Followers 82
Posts 4778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/27/2007

Re: genisi post# 128021

Saturday, 10/08/2011 3:26:19 PM

Saturday, October 08, 2011 3:26:19 PM

Post# of 252254
Here's the critical text of the law, with a confusing parenthetical omitted:

It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, o r to sell, or sell within
the United States or import into the United States a patented invention ... solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products.



So one reading of this law is that Amphastar (or Teva) could freely infringe on MNTA's patent during the development process just so long as they don't infringe during the manufacturing process. I personally think that reading of the statute goes beyond the intent of the law, but it is still an argument that MNTA will have to deal with.

Here's an article on this R&D exception:

http://leda.law.harvard.edu/leda/data/234/Concannon,_Sarah_paper_00.pdf



Peter


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.