Anti-Globalist Forum

[IxCimi]

First off, always be cordial, but basically mute, to law enforcement.

You are not obligated answer any questions or to say ANYTHING at all.

When asked if you know why he stopped you, you of course you have no idea (why he would stop a Sovereign?). ; )

When signing the ticket as a "promissory note" to appear in court, it is a negotiable instrument until you invalidate it. You can sign the ticket without conflict. By placing brackets around your name like so, [Jamoke], you legally invalidates the signature, creating no legal contract. Then, for good measure, two other options can be evoked. One, place a capital letters U.D. after your bracketed name for Under Duress. No contract signed under duress is valid in a court of law. Secondly, print "At arm's length" on the ticket. This establishes clearly there is no fiduciary duty between you and the idemsonan.

You then have three days to evoke these action by bringing these details to the atttention of the county clerk. That invalidates your obligation to appear.

Should you decide to appear, when called up you say, “I am here by Restricted Appearance, to challenge Jurisdiction ONLY. I am NOT here to Testify or to Plead, and I do NOT swear to Oaths. Are you, SIR, a DULLY ELECTED JUDICIAL OFFICER?”

To which he may reply “No. I see that you have been ticketed for no seat belt. How do you plead?”

Now you NEVER want to get caught up in this game. Entering a plea gains the Court presumptive jurisdiction.

So again you say, “Excuse me, SIR, but according to the [Your States laws], I am allowed a DULY ELECTED JUDICIAL OFFICER. If you are NOT one of those, then I disqualify you for cause.”

This is because you want a Court of Record. One with a Prosecutor at the bench and not just an Administrative hearing. So he makes you a hearing time.

When this happens, you appear and say, “I am here by Restricted Appearance in the matter of (Jamoke), to challenge Jurisdiction ONLY. I am not here to plead or to testify, and I do not swear to Oaths.”

Now, they will try to trick you. So the Judge will to trap you into contracting with the Court, by ignoring you by asking “Mr. Jamoke I see that you are charged with no seat beat. How do you plead?”

At which point you state, “For the record, do you have the CHARGING INSTRUMENT?” (This is a SWORN record, or “Verified Complaint” by the District Attorney, of the charges against you. They NEVER have this. How can the "State" or the "People of the State" have done this with FIRST HAND knowledge? Impossible!
The Cop has no sworn injury complaint against you! He's just a representative. So WHO can issue a sworn statement against you?

NO ONE!

Another option is,

[You] "In order to be a policeman you had to swear an oath to support both State and Federal Constitutions didn’t you?"
[Officer answer] "Yes."
[You] "On the day and time you approached me did you attempt to elicit an affirmative response from me as to the reason you had stopped me? In other words, you asked me if I knew why you had stopped me, is this correct?"
[Officer answer] "Yes."
[You] "And you were armed with a weapon, were you not?"
[Officer answer] "Yes."
[You] "Having sworn an oath to the constitution you came upon me by force of arms in an attempt to compel me to be a witness against myself in felony breach of your fiduciary duty pursuant to the oath you sworn, is this correct?"
[Officer answer] "Yes."

Or the Prosecution bolts upright and declares "Objection! Calls for legal opinion!"

At which case in either scenario,

[You] "I move to dismiss with prejudice as this officer has just impeached himself (or been impeached) under oath."