| Followers | 218 |
| Posts | 38765 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 04/29/2008 |
Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:08:06 PM
Every mandate to buy something could be viewed as an economic stimulator. As we've already seen, the courts are not inclined to see it that way. In addition, there is a large upfront cost (smaller for the cell phone based units, but still not 0). It took decades to legislate seat belt laws and they were already installed. We still don't have a uniform helmet law. The country is not clamoring for more requirements and regulations of industry, nor are the EOBR manufacturers likely to be big contributors to politicians.
All in all, I think the manufacturers will need to sell their devices based on cost savings benefits - and that's a tough sell to most smaller businesses.
All in all, I think the manufacturers will need to sell their devices based on cost savings benefits - and that's a tough sell to most smaller businesses.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
GEORGE SANTAYANA
Recent ERAO News
- Energy Resource Abundance Inc. Files 2025 Annual Disclosure and Reports Four Successive Quarters of Profitability • ACCESS Newswire • 02/18/2026 05:20:00 PM
- Energy Revenue America, Inc. Reports Three Consecutive Quarters of Net Income • ACCESS Newswire • 10/20/2025 06:20:00 PM
