News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257269
Next 10
Followers 2
Posts 144
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/03/2010

Re: biomaven0 post# 125648

Thursday, 08/25/2011 11:25:59 AM

Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:25:59 AM

Post# of 257269
I think you are missing the fact that it looks like they only tested CTx in patients with cancers where bone mets are reasonably common. Thus in the non-prostate cohort where they tested Ctx, over 60% (46/73) in fact had bone mets. So it's not too surprising that the effect was similar.



Interestingly ovarian cohort had a total of 70 patients, and described 6(9%) of which had bone metastasis. That is an unusually high number of patients compared to historical numbers I've seen. Mostly under 1% of Ovarian cancer population.

I want to look at Lung cohert as well, but I'm wondering why we don't see before and after bone scans in these tumor types? I'm guessing this population didn't get a baseline bone scan. Lung Cancer is typical to see bone mets, and prognosis is horrible an average of 6 month survival with bone mets. I'm surprised Exelixis hasn't followed up on this cohort more to get some bone scan data.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today