News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 82
Posts 4778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/27/2007

Re: mouton29 post# 125386

Saturday, 08/20/2011 5:36:16 PM

Saturday, August 20, 2011 5:36:16 PM

Post# of 257253

It sounds like you don't regard MNTA's IP as an impediment.



Any sort of process-type patent is always going to be easier to get around than a COM patent. There are also issues about what happens if the design of their drug happened outside the US (and potentially infringes), but the manufacture does not infringe. At the end of the day, a not unlikely outcome in my view would be that MNTA gets a modest royalty on the Teva product.

The Amphastar disclosures happened in their lawsuit against the FDA. They were referenced on this board at the time but I don't have a link handy.

Peter

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now