InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,430.40
(
0.14%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.53
(
-0.20%
)
Bitcoin
65,190.85
(
0.34%
)
Post# of 29406
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

DewDiligence

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 834
Posts 119875
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

DewDiligence

Member Level

Re: OakesCS post# 3216

Saturday, 07/30/2011 6:11:42 PM

Saturday, July 30, 2011 6:11:42 PM

Post# of 29406

nice to know that our news writers and the EPA have separated water from the realm of chemicals.

I can’t tell whether the Bloomberg writer who used the phrase, “water and chemicals” is simply dumb… or whether this is a deliberate attempt to discredit fracking by making it sound worrisome to the kinds of readers who imagine that all chemicals are bad, especially when they are deployed by evil corporations.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up