Sorry if you think it is okay to make false or exaggerated statements of alleged fact and not expect someone to point out the inaccuracies....
This is a lie and gross inaccuracy. I never said that and never said I expected you to ignore inaccuracies. Very interesting how you, a supposed attorney, are not capable of understanding such simple sentences.
-----
Had you stated that alleged legal experts had called it a technicality, and I doubt anyone who is really an expert would have called it that although I don't doubt...
Excuse me. This is a forum for informal discussions not a review of legal documents. The majority of people here are not attorneys. And, I'm not paid to explain in every single post where I may have picked up each piece of information. When someone asks, I tell him. Usually, I give it before even being asked out of kindness not as an obligation. You weren't even part of the conversation. Had you asked why I used that particular term I would have explained.
It doesn't matter if you believe other attorneys on the news called it a technicality. They did. Others on this very board used the same term before me. Not only did you fail to correct theirs prior to mine but you also failed to cite any legal references (less the ruling) to support your own opinion. Very sloppy Mr supposed attorney.
-----
"We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful."
-- Warren Buffett
AI
