Sorry if you think it is okay to make false or exaggerated statements of alleged fact and not expect someone to point out the inaccuracies. Feel free to ignore me if you like. No skin off my butt. But, don't expect me to ignore blatantly inaccurate statements of alleged fact -- especially with regard to legal matters. I will, however, try to be better at softening the appearance. I guess the form is more important than the substance?
Had you stated that alleged legal experts had called it a technicality, and I doubt anyone who is really an expert would have called it that although I don't doubt that some uninformed talking heads actually called it that, I would have addressed it to their comments. But, you did not do so. You stated it as though it was fact and as though you knew something about it -- and it was not and you apparently did not.
I noticed that you apparently have no quarrel with the ultimate inaccuracy of your statements. Here is an editorial: attacking the messenger rather than the message is the epitome of editorializing regarding someone's posts. I don't mind the editorializing and everyone is entitled to their opinion, even if it has no factual basis, but I don't suffer well the "do as I say not as I do" approach.
I called you no names, made no personal references, and addressed all of my comments to the substance of your comments and not at you, personally, in any way. Sorry if you read it otherwise.
Troy
Those who shoot from the hip usually end up just shooting themselves.
Plan the grub and grub the plan.
Where is the party tonight? Who is bringng the drinks?
