News Focus
News Focus
Followers 18
Posts 1395
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/29/2009

Re: mordicai post# 322726

Tuesday, 07/19/2011 7:16:18 PM

Tuesday, July 19, 2011 7:16:18 PM

Post# of 749756
Since Raj Rajaratnam has been the biggest IT case recently, I looked back at some articles on his case to see if it stated how Preet Bharara or the prosecutors determined "material" or "non-public" info that is traded on.

Here's a 5/12/11 article after he was convicted and a quote from it:

Prosecutors dismantled Mr. Rajaratnam’s defense by acknowledging that Galleon performed legitimate research. But at the same time, they argued, the firm routinely violated securities laws.

In the words of a former Galleon portfolio manager who testified during the trial, the firm did its homework — but also cheated on the test.
Mr. Rajaratnam sought out information that was confidential, beyond the reach of research, and illegally traded on it.


****So from the his case, IT is based on ""Confidential and beyond the reach of research.""****

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/raj_rajaratnam/index.html


Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today