Meanwhile the EC continues to burn cash. What they simply can't grasp as evidenced in their objection is that secured creditors are at the top of the totem pole and have to be made whole first.
Arguing anything else is a waste of money. Expecting that the judge will order that secured creditors take less so the EC gets some is a joke.
And now they want to re-argue the GSA all over again? Throw another couple of million down the tubes.
"For when the One Great Scorer comes To write against your name, He marks-not that you won or lost- But how you played the game." -Grantland Rice