InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 37
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/12/2011

Re: GWMAN post# 438

Saturday, 07/16/2011 2:44:30 AM

Saturday, July 16, 2011 2:44:30 AM

Post# of 932
I agree lets get rid of dead wood. If the UK is dead and as people say then it should go. If there is court case then we have to ask how the money was used and why they can not pay creditors or staff.

I am not dwelling on that. I want to see commercial units and we have talked about this over and over, and here we have a unit at a Zoo working and winning awards.

Facts are Facts UK did not make any sales true but they did do the design work on the zoo system and that works. The people who did that where not the sales people so why have we not kept those people or have we to help improve VertiCrop.
Fane will not be desiging the new Verticrop and building it to iron out the bugs so who is.

So my question is why have Valcent not got a "Little Unit" this would not cost $1,000,000 to build so again why for so little money have we not built one.?

No doubt about it if Institute B had not come on we would be dead,
Also is the zoo a 3rd or 4th generation system if it is the 3rd then release the 4th and publise it. The zoo is working and producing crops so why not use it.? We have nothing else to show as a working prototype. I would like to see
1? Working unit to promote it ( I think we have the zoo unit )
2/ UK not suitable so build in US
3/ Are we using inhouse Grower skills or outside companies
4/ Sort out the UK and cut it loose if it is dead wood.
5/ All this talk about the UK is tarnishing the Valcent name again
That is my say so I will wait and see what happens. After all we can only talk Fane and Co have to Do it.
Untill i have something else to say

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.