Alot in your last post.
1. I definitely think you should post what you think.
2. It is very clear that Fane is not a good public speaker and I suspect he knows that. In due time, I suspect he will give up that task to someone else, but we are not commercial yet and it is clear Fane is trying to get rid pof the rot before moving on to the next phase of hiring what the company needs.
3. No, I do not believe the Zoo camera is real markleting these days. The company wants to be commercial and actaully make money. This requires hard revenue data, not visually appeasing cameras of plants moving around in circles. While I would like to have the zoo camera going, it is not important to business development, IMO.
4. I will not make judgement on who should or should not be retained in the UK. Facts are facts: they had two years tro generate positive cash flow or revenue or earnings. They did none of the above from what I can tell. If they are redundant or deemed no longer valuable for the commercialization phase then so be it.
BTW, on a final point, IMNoviceO, this company was a whisker away from being bankrupt and becoming non-existent. In turn, I find all this reporting about certain company employees or the UK office getting screwed a complete joke. IMO, if anyone objective came in and assessed the history of the company, most would be fired. If that actually happened, well, that is life in the big city.
Oooh, someone invented something related 6 years ago or someone worked on the 2nd generation of some component for which we are now on the 4th generation? If such things happened, I am not worried about them being cut loose. This is not the 1950s and no one should delude themselves to believe it is and that somehow they should be treated like family. There is no family in the 21st century of business. Deal with it.
AI
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
