I don't have too much to say here anymore, but I am willing to also help with documenting the premeditated deception perpetrated by Sutton (with assistance from Magone).
Sutton's still deserves to feel some of the pain he's inflicted on others, and I'm hopeful that will be delivered in due course, but he also deserves to pay the legal price for what he's done here.
Magone has been groomed to be an unwitting accomplice. He's a dupe, plain and simple.
There are many, many things that, over time, confirmed the true nature of what was going on here. For me, it came to a head with the following:
Sutton was being skewered, and I was asked by Magone and Sutton to prepare a list of questions that shareholders would appreciate having answered in order to alleviate some of the negativity. I did, and Sutton answered. I chose not to comment on the answers (that they went ahead and PR'd), as it was clear to me it was nothing more than an attempt to placate rightfully angry shareholders. It was, like everything else Sutton, an exercise in creative BS.
It was revealed within days that, prior to the questions being answered, Sutton and GOIG had been served with a cease and desist by Intregen and GOIG had filed a preemptive suit in a half-assed attempt to appear as though they were in the right. Of course nothing was said about any of it it when responding to the questions, it was 'announced' here in fact, and it turns out that Sutton had been aggressive in trying to licence the Intregen patents and failed (due in no small part to his business practices).
I contacted Magone, who was in the dark about all of it. I also told him that a simple review of press releases on the Goip Global website left no doubt that Sutton had been projecting 'cash flow positive by next quarter' for several years, all based on things that never materialized. Magone seemed genuinely concerned that he may have been complicit in advancing the Sutton cause, and suggested he was considering packing it in.
Next I hear from Magone, he calls me to 'check in' (I guess sort of like Ike looking forward to talking to each and every shareholder). But in addition to just 'chatting' he also throws out this notion that there may be a 'short squeeze' coming on account of 'the merge' and the required delivery of shares. Now I'm no rocket scientist, but it was pretty obvious to me that this was a planned strategy, designed by Sutton, to hopefully generate some additional share sales and/or an attempt to prevent too much dumping by major shareholders.
I did not post anything about this 'short squeeze' notion, but others did, which indicated that Magone had contacted a number of shareholders to float this idea (supposedly on the QT). I, of course, asked Magone if this was coming directly from Sutton. He waffled, he hemmed and hawed, and then reluctantly allowed that, yes, it had come from Sutton. I told Magone that he had better watch what he says as Sutton was clearly getting him to do his bidding, there would be no attachment to Sutton for this most recent 'promotion' (other than Magone's own word), and when the SEC comes a calling, he's going to find his ass in a wringer. He indicated he understood what I was saying and that he had had about enough of all of it. Problem is, he did nothing about it (and continues to 'help' Sutton...at least over at the light company).
I have defended Magone in the past. His intentions were initially genuine IMO and he has not profited to any great extent with all this, but, in the face of overwhelming evidence as to Sutton's intentions, he has chosen to remain in his camp.
They're both fair game...and I'd be more than willing to help in the hunt.
Oil.
