A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board

[The Grabber]

Bernie: My apologies. I didn't mean to misquote you. I was cutting and pasting sentences when crafting the post and got things a little discombobulated.

What I meant to say was that you were correct in that if you are investing with an eye towards dividends as being a major component in your return expectations, then by all means you should put all your $ in it. I didn't mean to imply that you supported not investing totally if it wasn't a high yield instrument.

You've made it clear (and for many good reasons) you don't yet support LD-AIM, and that's OK. I accept your opinion.

I maintain that it may yet prove to be a very powerful and flexible approach to investing using AIM. Especially if used as a seedling approach to start new programs with fewer $. Certainly it is clear that if one were to start a new program using LD-AIM; and then let standard AIM manage it long term (in Warren Time?), the difference in total $ return one method versus another would diminish. If this is true, then the $ saved on that initial purchase could also be used to start another program. Therfore you would be more diversified lowering your risk probability to some degree.

Again I apologize.

Regards, Steve