News Focus
News Focus
Followers 30
Posts 4021
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/01/2004

Re: stock_hippie post# 169804

Saturday, 05/28/2005 12:31:21 PM

Saturday, May 28, 2005 12:31:21 PM

Post# of 359153
All I'm saying is folks should pay attention to what service they're really paying for. The agreement mentions nothing about NSS, and the judge previously ruled it's not a relevant issue in this particular case. Furthermore, the company itself never presented NSS as an affirmative defense in this proceeding.

Frizzell probably couldn't justify spending $130,000 or whatever so he starts compiling some secret "evidence" using flawed collection methods and not even knowing all the players in this story. He plans to submit this "stuff" in a hearing where NSS was already ruled as not relevant. What exactly is this supposed to accomplish? IMO it's not going to have any effect on the judge's decision about revocation. The SEC attorneys can't do very much when handed a mountain of flawed data. Once the final ruling is made, the current written contract terminates. He can no longer go to others saying he represents 5,300+ investors because he won't have documentation to back this up.




-----
"We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful."
-- Warren Buffett

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today