Hi Bernie:
The whole point for me currently is Diversification, Amplification, Maximisation.
Your points related to 'losing' dividend income by investing fewer $ is correct, but I'm ok with that if it gets me to my goals as stated above. I'm not running into this blindly.
I'll ignore the Enron reference. This is totally different.
In LD-AIM there are no borrowed $, no phantom $, no jingoistic magical spells. Just a reasoned approach to leveraging the AIM algorithm at the start of a program for fewer $. Thereby making the unused $ 'Available' for another program.
I guess it's AIM on Sale <smile> 2 for the price of 1
Regards, Steve
Best Regards, Steve (The Grabber)