News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1532
Posts 37307
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 07/12/2004

Re: None

Sunday, 06/19/2011 12:04:21 PM

Sunday, June 19, 2011 12:04:21 PM

Post# of 222350
Question seeking an answer.

Can a programme be set up where members who have other members on ignore be prevented from replying to the ignored member's stand alone posts by making the IGNORE selection a non-revolving selection? That is, an IGNORE is an IGNORE that could have a time requirement of an exampled one week minimum duration and not 2 minutes duration several times per day at the whim of the ignoramous.

It offends my olfactory senses worse than skunk odor when a gutless member can reply to another member's stand alone posts when that gutless member shouldn't see those stand alone posts when the ignore function is engaged.

Such reprehensible conduct by gutless members who engage in this behavior defiles and abuses the purpose of the ignore function which is to enhance T.O.U. compliance.

Being a staunch advocate of the T.O.U. I wouldn't dare mention who *um* I am *referring to* but I betcha the *um* *gutless* member who has me on ignore reads this stand alone post before any other I-Hubber.


To bite the worm of incite is to bite the HOOK of the antagonist . They win .

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today